Wilkins responds to Oregon's Swanson

Recently Oregon CR Chairman John Swanson lambasted candidate for KFCR Chairman and former CRNC and LI field rep Morgan Wilkins for her actions during the fall election season, and Wilkins has responded in kind to the statement. It looks like we could have a bit of a war of words on our hands here. First, Swanson's statement, followed by Wilkins' reply:

Ladies and Gentlemen,

I am clearly an outsider looking in – my relationship with KFCR officers in the past has been little more than brief conversations and the sharing of ideas. Maybe there is something I am missing in this equation, but based on what I have observed, I feel obligated to step up and voice my humble opinion.

In any political organization, there are 2 defining forces – those who make progress, and those who do not. Progress is made by carrying your message correctly, respectfully, and in a manner that convinces and attracts. I have every reason to believe that after Kentucky’s chapter growth and stable leadership, progress has occurred – and ought to be continued.

Progress is hindered when a message is either not carried out, or carried out improperly. Too often, College Republicans resort to unconvincing tactics to convey issues to their peers. It is always vital to judge your success based on the degree to which you grow the Republican Party – not the volume in which you shout at left-wing students. I was appalled to see that a representative of our national organization was using such immaturity – with blatant racism and seduction, evidence of which was apparent on several websites. I feel the College Republican National Committee is an organization of integrity, and the act of eliminating this loose cannon from payroll proved that the CRNC lives up to such a standard.

It is appalling to see that after jeopardizing the legitimacy of our organization, this same individual has gained momentum to become a state chair. I believe I speak for more state chairmen than just myself by saying that I have serious reservations to this. Delegates at the KFCR convention: Pretend you’re an HR manager, and you have 2 employees in front of you for 1 job. One was fired from a similar job for failure to perform adequately, and the other has a proven track record and recommended by a successful predecessor. The choice is clear – always aim for progress.

John Swanson
State Chairman, Oregon

John-
In your letter you claim that you are simply an "outsider" who is so troubled with the possibility of me becoming KFCR Chair that you feel the obligation to intervene. You also state several concerns that you have with me as a College Republican, and especially as a leader.

It is very unfortunate that we have never actually spoken to each other, and that instead of addressing me personally with your concerns, you resort immediately to writing a degrading letter on my opponent's facebook wall. Do you call that "progressive?"

You also say in your letter that "It is appalling to see that after jeopardizing the legitimacy of our organization, this same individual has gained momentum to become a state chair."

John, the legitimacy of the organization was not jeopardized by me, but by the person who signed deceitful fundraising letters two years ago; the person you voted for: our national chairman, Paul Gourley.

One event does not compare to the culture of corruption that took over the CRNC years before I even got involved, but one vote legitimizes it: your vote for Paul Gourley. And maybe this could be forgiven, but even today you continue to voice your support for someone who brought shame to our organization. Liberty has no time for moderates.

The KFCR is suffering in many ways that you, as an outsider, may not realize. I am currently working together with many College Republicans across the state to make this federation all that is should be. We are making significant progress.

If you would like me to fill you in on KY matters in more detail in the future, then please feel free to contact me personally.

Respectfully,
Morgan Wilkins

The CRNC campaign thus far, plus what to expect

Colorado's Charlie Smith has had the floor for the better part of a month now, and while he has not used the open microphone very extensively, he is still the lone candidate in the race. For better or worse, whether you agree with his silence since announcing his candidacy or not, no one is exactly forcing him to explain himself.

No platform? No problem, because there is no one there to call him out about running for an office for which he has no plans for. No website? No problem, because no one else can say they have a better one. No announcement of a national chapter and state tour? No problem, because there is no need to get out on the stump for votes when there is no opposing candidate.

This past week, feathers were ruffled when Smith turned down the invitation to appear on a panel at CPAC, a panel which also featured Leadership Institute mogul Morton Blackwell. A group of state chairmen sent him an email expressing their displeasure for this move, but it was largely misconstrued as anger that Smith was appearing to slight the Leadership Institute. The real reason for the email? Well, it is right there in the email, for all to see: how can Charlie Smith claim to not be the CRNC's favored son when they chose him to appear on the panel? In 2005, when it came time for CPAC, Chairman candidate Paul Gourley was tapped to appear on the CRNC's behalf. The CRNC generally gets "their guy" to do this, and while Smith chose not to accept, the very fact that he was asked sends bad signs.

Next weekend is the planned summit of the key players in this election in California, at a pseudo-conference with Michael Davidson that looks to be a much more contentious version of Yalta, where the Churchill and FDR figures will not let the Stalin figure out of line an inch. This is not the first such meeting of the minds, but it is the broadest such gathering of this election season to date. Along with state chairmen and key figures like Davidson will be several key advisors to the former "Opposition" movement, which now finds itself seemingly splintered into a thousand little fragments, a mere shell of its former self.

Charlie Smith has had the ear of Davidson before, but came away without winning the key endorsement. Davidson signing on with Smith would be the death knell sounding upon any hopeful candidate looking get in the race, as California would likely be off the table and in Smith's column. All signs from former Real Reform principals Brian Siler and Brent Ludeman, both of whom will attend next weekend's gathering, point to New Jersey's Frank Luna as the current flagbearer. Luna, however, has been reluctant to commit to a run, taking more of a wait and see approach.

Time, especially in this campaign, is of the essence, simply due to the difficulty of getting College Republicans gathered together in large groups to address. Next month’s edition of CPAC is really the only chance for candidates to have the ears of a multitude of CRs from around the country until July’s CRNC Convention. The March 1 kickoff for CPAC is looming right around the corner, and it leaves only a week and a half after this weekend’s California summit to make preparations for a campaign kickoff. That is roughly ten days to book a location for the announcement reception/campaign kickoff event, get campaign collateral designed and printed, develop a platform for the campaign, organize a street team of supporters to get the word out and promote your candidacy, and get a fully-functioning website up and running. Ten days surely creates something of a time squeeze to say the least.

The next twenty five days will be among the most exciting of the spring for anyone following this CRNC campaign, and especially for those actually involved in it. Imagine this schedule for a random state chairman traveling this weekend to California:

Friday afternoon, February 16: Board plane for cross-country flight, plus connections and layovers en route
Friday evening: Dinner with the other attendees
Saturday, February 17: Meetings and discussions all day
Saturday night or Sunday: Board plane for return trip home
Monday through Friday (2/19-2/23): Classes, midterms, and state federation business
Saturday, February 24 and Sunday, February 25: In the case of Ohio’s Brian Siler, a Leadership Institute YLS and Ohio Board Meeting
Monday through Wednesday (2/26-2/28): Classes, midterms, preparing to travel to DC.
Wednesday afternoon through Thursday early morning: depart for CPAC, hotel check-in, CPAC registration
Thursday through Saturday (March 1-3): CPAC itself, all state federation gatherings, CRNC events, and any other meetings scheduled
Sunday morning, March 4: depart DC for home

In any case, this race will take shape over the next twenty-five odd days, and we will work here to keep you updated on every twist, every turn, every little bit of information that you need to know.

Free food and beverage to be in abundance at CPAC

Let alone the fact that this is a CRNC campaign year, and that candidates in that race will undoubtedly throw open-bar bashes, and you will still find plenty of free plunder to be had during next month's edition of CPAC. Mainefest is always on everyone's calendar for the trip to DC, and we reported last week that Ohio will also throw a separate party during CPAC as well. Ohio has historically hosted an event for all Ohio CRs in attendance, but will for the first time be opening the doors to all. Emails were sent out yesterday to state chairmen inviting them to DC Fest 2007, hosted by Mike Keough's DC Federation of College Republicans on the first day of CPAC at the Hawk n Dove. Please consider this my open plea to OCRF officers to NOT name the Ohio party "Ohio Fest". I thought that a "fest" was usually a title reserved for a hippie convention, but I could very well be wrong.

CR Power Rankings

As requested by you, the reader, we present the latest attempt at CR Power Rankings. There are some new names, some old names, and some people that should probably just move on past their glory days. These rankings are completely scientific, so feel free to treat them as such. Without further ado, on to stroking egos:

National Power Rankings:

1) Michael Davidson: Please note that potential candidates to replace Chairman Gourley are gunning for Davidson's approval, not Gourley's.
2) Amanda Hydro: Lay the blame for the past two years at her feet, as she is effectively playing Chairman at this point.
3) Frank Luna: Has everyone waiting to see if he jumps into the race. CPAC fast approaches, so time is of the essence.
4) John Plecnik: His name is here simply for ego stroking purposes. If we were being honest, he wouldn't even smell such a list.
5) Charlie Smith: Mr. Smith has the floor, certainly, but will he take advantage of it or continue backroom dealing?
6) Brian Siler: My humble attempt to suckle at the teet of power.
7) Derek Hall: He may not necessarily ask for importance, but everyone wants his approval just as much as Davidson's.
8) Paul Gourley: Even though he has been effectively forced out of the day-to-day, he may just pop up at the ACU as a comeback of sorts.
9) Mason Harrison: Unless he makes a pledge of support soon, his time will be in high demand come CPAC-time.
10) Lindy Dinklage: Not in the employ of the CRNC any longer, but meddling has always been a favorite pastime.
11) Blake Harris: Moved up the hierarchy of advisors this cycle, but did he forsake what got him there?
12) Michael Miltenberger: Unmistakably making the rounds with Mr. Smith, and has probably landed himself on the ticket. Did he do anything substantive to deserve it though?
13) Brent Ludeman: Found the sledding tough yet again in his second solo go-round.
14) Ryan Bilodeau: Has a network of connections that rivals most state chairman, let alone any rank and file College Republican.
15) Nick Miccarelli: Making the rounds with as well; how high will he be on the ticket?

State Chairman Candidate Rankings:
1) Steve Japinga: Election is a sure thing for him, but how long will the coat tails be in Michigan?
2) Morgan Wilkins: Running the race on her own terms, and most definitely defining the debate in Kentucky.
3) Sean Matthew: Almost seems assured of victory, and Pennsylvania is always a player nationally.
4) Chris Stark: Will he remain unopposed in Jersey, and can he continue Luna's cleanup job of the past year?
5) Erin Karriker: Out of state players are trying to knock him off, but are they a nuisance or a threat?

Power on the wane:
1) Nate Walton: Maine Fest is all he has going it seems.
2) Sarah Armstrong: We will believe it when we see it, but word on the street has Connecticut slipping from her grasp come springtime.
3) Erin McTiernan: New York is always volatile, and we hear plenty of unrest with the way she has (or hasn't) run the state fed.
4) Paul Gourley: Go ahead and add the "former" to his Chairman title.
5) Dan Schuberth: Rumors of a late jump into the national race have all but disappeared.

Ones to watch:
1) Justin Jordan: Who knows what he will say or do next, but we will be watching for sure.
2) Frank Luna/Brian Siler: Will they or won't they? Time will tell, but time they do not have.
3) Ryan Bilodeau: Could be part of the new crop of state chairs, but he has plenty of influence regardless.
4) Michael Davidson: Upcoming consortium in California is last shot to impress before CPAC, and a non-endorsement is as good as a death knell for any opposition to Smith.
5) Presidential candidates: Who gives money, and to whom, will be an interesting saga indeed.

Wilkins issues second debate challenge to Kentucky opponent

Candidate for Kentucky State Chairman Morgan Wilkins has issued a second challenge to debate to her opponent, Louisville CR Chairman Michael Wray. Wray reportedly has yet to reply to the original challenge, issued almost a week ago, and his silence on the matter apparently has some of his own supporters asking questions. Wray entered the race with the blessing of Derek Hall, among others, after Wilkins kicked off her campaign in mid-January.

We will continue to follow this story as it develops, but we surmise that this move goes a long way to dispel any rumors of Wilkins dropping out of the race. It appears that she is in, and in to win. Kentucky will gather for its annual convention and elections on the weekend of April 13 and 14, a weekend that is already shaping up to be a busy one with a flurry of other state gatherings scheduled as well. A practical solution to ensure as many CRs as possible see the debate would be to hold it before or after the next KFCR Board Meeting, if anyone in Kentucky is listening.

Arkansas State Chairman race update

Arkansas was not a state included in our mass update on the various state chairman races earlier in the week, but a couple of names have surfaced. Arkansas Chairman John Burris, of Arkansas Tech, is not reportedly seeking re-election, and at least two names have been tossed around in the past few weeks. Most recently, former Arkansas Tech Chairman and current Grassroots Director for AFCR Bryant Davis announced his intention to run for the post. Davis has a website up and running for the campaign, and has promised a platform to be forthcoming. A name that has been in circulation for awhile now is that of Chase Dugger of Arkansas State. We will follow this race as it develops.

Christopher Stark to run for NJCR Chairman

Election season for College Republicans is heating up as CPAC rapidly approaches, and New Jersey now has a potential successor to Frank Luna in the pipe. Seton Hall junior Christopher Stark is currently the NJCR Executive Director, and he appears to be supported, although not formally endorsed, by Luna. We will provide a link to his website when it goes live in the coming days, and continue to report on any other candidates in the race. His platform centers on expanding the NJCR presence to every campus within the Garden State and proposes the hiring of a Field Coordinator to supplement any CRNC help. Other stated goals of Stark include improved training, an increased presence on the Internet, decentralization to a degree, and more regular communication within the organization. Keep an eye on New Jersey in the coming weeks, in any case, because we continue to hear whisperings of a Frank Luna run for CRNC Chairman.

Former CRNC Chairman Bill Spadea is seen here on the left with Christopher Stark, candidate for NJCR Chairman.

State Chairman Race Rundown

As promised, coverage of the various CR State Chairman races that are gearing up is here. For now, here is a list of the candidates for office in each state, along with additional pertinent info on the race itself.

Kentucky:
Morgan Wilkins (KCTCS) vs. Michael Wray (Louisville)

Wilkins is the outside candidate in this Reform-held state, running against former KFCR Chairman Derek Hall's candidate of choice in Wray. It is also of note that while Wray would obstensibly hold the same, or similar, views with regard to national matters, Wilkins has not spoken publicly about these matters in any sort of depth. Wilkins arrived on the national scene this past fall after a very public controversy surrounding her performance as a CRNC Field Rep in Michigan, for which some feel she was dealt with in a bad way. She has also joined up with Students for Brownback as the Kentucky Chairman, while Wray's 2008 loyalties are heretofore unknown.

North Carolina:
Erin Karriker (UNC Charlotte) vs. Tyson Grinstead (UNC Chapel Hill)

Former CR John Plecnik appears to be meddling back in his old stomping grounds, as he has recruited Grinstead to run against outgoing NC Chairman Jon Thompson's pick in Erin Karriker. Both have released platforms, and this has been a slightly contentious race to date. Sources say, however, that Karriker has the votes necessary to win.

Florida:
David Stevens (Florida State) vs. Tommy Keller (Stetson)

Stevens is currently the second-in-command to outgoing Chairman Scott Wacholtz, and is rumored to have his support as well. Keller is the current Treasurer of FFCR, and has not made public his support for any of the P2008 candidates. Stevens is believed to be a Romney supporter, and this race appears to be up in the air. We give a slight edge to Stevens.

Michigan:
Steve Japinga (Michigan State)

Controversial two-term Chairman Dan Carlson is on his way out, and Japinga has been in the race for awhile now. At first, rumors swirled as to who Carlson would tap to run against Japinga, but leading potential candidate Justin Zatkoff settled for a run at a lower ticket spot. While there is still time to put someone in the race, we see Japinga as the likely successor to Carlson. Zatkoff is facing Michigan State's Jeff Wiggins for the Co-Chairman slot, a race that is less crowded after Ryan Thompson bowed out last week.

New York:
Kelly Eustis (SUNY Potsdam)

Eustis is the rumored successor to Erin McTiernan, if she decides not to run again. Her announced reason for not seeking a national run was to strengthen her home state, which is truly in shambles. New York has always been a tumultuous state federation, so this will be a state to watch regardless.

Minnesota:
Bethany Dorobiala (Minnesota-Twin Cities)

Dorobiala appears to be next up in Minnesota, and she has paired up with Co-Chair candidate Nathan Swanson for her run. We are currently researching this race and will report information on it as we have it.

Pennsylvania:
Sean-Tamba Matthew (Penn)

Nick Miccarelli's pick is the only known candidate in Pennsylvania at this time, and we will continue to report on this race as more information is known.

Arkansas:
Chase Dugger

Dugger would appear to be the choice of current Chairman John Burris, who will not be seeking another term.

Colorado:
Craig Conroy (Regis)

Conroy has been a rumored successor to CRNC Chairman candidate Charlie Smith, but is not certain at this time.

Tennessee:
Jonathan Bryant (Bryan College)

Lindsay Moffett's handpicked successor currently serves as her second in command.

West Virginia:
Brian Dayton (WVU)

Dayton has done a solid job in his first term, and is rumored to be seeking a second term.

Rhode Island:
Ryan Bilodeau (URI)

Bilodeau is a favorite of RSR, as he has run a phenomenal chapter at URI and is a staunch conservative. He is known to be interested in seeking to follow outgoing Chairman Ethan Wingfield, and there will possibly be opposition to his candidacy from a couple of minor candidates.

Texas:
Eliza Vielma (Texas State) or Justin Jordan (Texas Southern)

Jordan would come to the forefront if Vielma decides not to seek another term, especially with long-rumored candidate Jason Fite graduating.

Ohio:
Although no one has announced, it is believed that if Chairman Brian Siler decides not to seek re-election this spring, his chosen replacement will come from his fellow Executive Board members, most likely one of his appointed officers who were instrumental in executing Ohio's highly successful field program last fall. There is not any major opposition to Siler within the state, but Ohio has a history of candidates hopping in the race as late as convention time in April.

Connecticut:
Over the past few days, Opposition operatives have been bragging openly about picking off this solid Establishment stronghold. We will see how this race develops.

We will continue to report on each of these races, and follow the remaining states as their respective elections near. If you have any information on these, or any other races, feel free to email or AIM us (AIM: redstaterampage).

Buckeye State Breakdown

This past weekend, the state board of the Ohio College Republican Federation gathered, and a few things of note came out of the meeting:

-Ohio will be holding a party/event at CPAC to rival MaineFest, although the two events will not be held at the same time to allow you, Joe CR, and you, pompous jackass (better known as Joe State Chairman), to attend both celebrations. Watch your mail for invitations to the gala, likely to be held at either Stars & Stripes or Hawk & Dove.

-It appears as well that Ohio will be a large presence again at CPAC with chapters attending the meeting reporting at least 300 Ohio CRs are making plans to attend the annual convention.

-Bids were entertained for the upcoming OCRF Convention, to be held in mid-April, and three separate bids were submitted to the board: Bowling Green State University, University of Akron, and a collaborative effort between Ohio State, Columbus State, and Otterbein College, three Columbus-area schools. The collaborators are seeking to bring 2007's convention to Downtown Columbus and were reportedly the only bidders ready to present said bid. A source has informed us that a website will soon be up and running to promote the effort.

-Keen listeners at the meeting noted the seeming annointment of a hand-picked successor to Chairman Brian Siler, and we will report more on this development as it unfolds.

-We at Red State Rampage would like to congratulate two of the newly elected Chapter Chairmen in Ohio: Natalie Brown of Franciscan University of Steubenville and Mary Estock of The Ohio State University. Best of luck to both of them in the next year, and a special thanks to outgoing FUS Chairman Billy Valentine and outgoing OSU Chairman Matt Kocsan for their service to their chapters, and the state organization itself.

Holding nothing back: Texas' Justin Jordan

(Note: The reason behind the delay in posting this interview is that I suck at life and accidentally deleted the file it was in and spent most of the day retrieving it. Luckily, I was able to pull it off, and put it all back in one piece. My most sincere apologies, but at least it is here, unlike Truth Caucus’ Who’s Next feature!)

Justin Jordan is surely the closest to a dynamo that we in College Republicans have, at least out of those that I have met or know of. There are very few people, not just in our organization, that possess strong moral fiber and great character, even an unwavering sense of right and wrong. Very few college freshmen make it out of their dorms for class on most days, let alone uncover and pursue corrupt administrators, even after being wrongfully arrested for doing so. There are also very few people in our organization, or in politics on the whole, that are as unabashed and forthright in offering their honest, candid opinions and answers. Very few have anyone in mind but themselves, as well, or care about results more than they do rhetoric. And even fewer would put their own political future on the line for what they believe is right.

Justin Jordan brings all of this to the table, plus a wealth of experience. Few have shot upward so quickly in College Republicans, going from founding a CR chapter to interim Texas Vice-Chairman in mere months. Next weekend, he will be up for special election in Texas to fill the rest of the current term as TFCR Vice Chairman, and some heavy hitters in Texas politics will be pulling for this young man. He holds nothing back, and if you do not like it, he is probably deservedly calling you out. So, without further pomp and circumstance, the much-anticipated Red State Rampage debut of Justin Jordan unleashed:

Red State Rampage: You are running to keep your job, in effect, as Vice Chairman of the Texas Federation of College Republicans, after you were appointed in the interim since Jason Fite of Texas A&M stepped down. Can you speak to why it is you were chosen to fill the role of Vice-Chairman, and why there was a vacancy?

Justin Jordan: Well the Chairwoman expressed her confidence in me after seeing that I am a hard worker. Jason Fite graduated in December so it left that vacancy within the organization. Eliza called me just as I was about to go and cut the yard and asked me if I would do it and I told her sure.

RSR: Since your appointment was temporary, you have to run in this special election to fill the rest of Fite's term officially. You are opposed in this race, by Ryan Murphy of the Colin County CC College Republicans, a chapter that has been involved in TFCR for almost three years longer than Texas Southern. What, then, uniquely qualifies you to be Vice Chairman instead of Ryan Murphy?

JJ: Well I have always believed that my relationship with various elected officials uniquely qualifies me to be Vice Chair. The Vice Chair's role is one of high importance because I am actually in charge of helping Republican candidates on the campaign trail and raising money-something i have effectively done at my own chapter.

RSR: Your candidacy has been endorsed by some heavy hitters in Texas politics, including Lt. Governor David Dewhurst, future Congressional candidate Paul Bettencourt, and the President of GOPUSA Dr. Bobby Eberle. How did you go about winning their support? How exactly can you capitalize on these individuals support to better TFCR for all of its members?

JJ: I won their support because they know how hard I work to keep Texas a red state every election season. These are respected folks around my state and in some parts of the country. With these guys behind me, it gives TFCR a chance to develop those relationships in other parts of the state and it will enable us to raise more money.

RSR: Corruption has been a hot button issue nationally, and you have been recognized for your efforts to battle corruption at your own university, Texas Southern. You and a couple of friends took on your school's President, and it certainly was not easy going at all. How has this experience affected your life, and would you do it all over again?

JJ: Well it lets me know that there should be a 2^nd Civil Rights movement started. One that frees blacks from Corrupt Ass Blacks who steal from their own children and people. It also showed me and the other 2 Gentleman that you have to be the change, you can’t just talk that talk and not walk the walk. If I had to do it all over again, I would in a New York Heartbeat! It was a challenge but it was also so much fun.

RSR: Did you ever consider backing down, especially when you were arrested during the ordeal?

JJ: No, it did scare me though. After we were arrested we went back to the Governor’s office then shortly after that we approached the Attorney General and his office who then introduced us to the Local District Attorney’s office. The DA’s office took the case and as a result of us turning over the evidence we had, Dr. Slade along with several other people have been indicted on numerous charges. Knowing many of them were indicted put a big smile on my face of course.

RSR: What advice would you pass along to someone in a similar situation as you found yourself in? What do you think can be learned by others from your actions?

JJ: No matter how much pressure is put on you always do the right thing. If you know you are right then what others say really means nothing.

RSR: Besides taking on corruption in your own backyard, U.S. Representative Tom Delay also represented your area until resigning amidst accusations of illegal activity. One of the pictures on your campaign Facebook group features you with Mr. Delay. Do you see Mr. Delay's situation as one he brought upon himself, or is it a mere political ploy, as some have suggested? And do you see his resignation as a good thing in the long run?

JJ: The accusations against Delay were like most lies, if you repeat them enough they start to sound true. Tom Delay was indicted by a backwoods hick Democrat named Ronnie Earle who has a record of going after Republicans with trumped up charges. I knew Congressman Delay and he was a great ally in terms of helping the CR’s in my area out. I volunteered on his campaign and we grew to know each other that way. I hated to see him resign, but what I can say is he is no Priscilla Slade.

RSR: You worked to found the College Republican group at Texas Southern, and you were successful in doing so. Texas Southern, as with other predominantly black colleges, presents a challenge to College Republicans, because of the perceived, and sometimes real, hostility to the Republican message. Do you see this as being a real issue, and, if so, what can College Republicans do to be successful in this area?

JJ: Well I think some black Republicans whine too much when they talk about the "hostility" they receive from other black people about being a Republican. Personally, I love the hostility from black liberals because usually I hate them just as much. However, the whole idea in recruiting minorities is that you don’t want an all black thing or an all white thing. I personally don’t think that all blacks should be involved in the GOP because we have some in the GOP now who are the biggest gate-keeping assholes. I can attest to that because they are in my state. These are your older ones mind you, but they are still narrow minded assholes and if they are reading this and are offended then I am talking about you.

RSR: There are some within the Republican Party who do not think Black Republicans can be successful in winning election. They often point to the recent losses by Maryland's Michael Steele, Pennsylvania's Lynn Swann, and Ohio's Ken Blackwell as evidence of this. In Blackwell's case, a race that I saw first-hand, this was even used against him in the primary, which he went on to win. What are your thoughts on the matter, and do you think they have a valid argument? Do you even think voters should consider race when choosing whom they will vote for?

JJ: No they don’t have a valid argument. First of all, who are “They”? Those in that “They” column are your cowards in the party, the ones who tear down and don’t build up. Black Republicans tend to do better with white voters and some black voters because they feel like that racial stigma will not be used (i.e the Jesse Jackson & Al Sharpton type of Bull Jive). Yes I think voters should factor race when choosing whom they vote for especially if Barack Hussein Obama is the Democrat Nominee. I hope that every white person and black finds that racist bone on Election Day and votes against him. He is not even black by the way, just ask Congressman Bobby Rush [RSR Note: U.S. Rep. Bobby Rush (D-Chicago) represents an urban district of Chicago, Illinois, and was challenged in the 2000 Democratic Primary by Obama]. I know I won’t be voting for him. Also, 2006 was a bad year for all Republicans and when you run most of your black candidates in blue states this is what happens. If they ran a black candidate in Texas or any other red state--in a district that isn't predominately black-- they would win, are you reading this ROVE?!?!?!?!

RSR: The national scene of College Republicans is, quite frankly, a mess. There is no semblance of cooperation, and many seem to have themselves at the heart of their interests. What are your thoughts on this situation, and what can you do as a state federation officer to help change this environment?

JJ: I don't have any thoughts on the national scene.

RSR: One question that I like to ask all College Republicans, especially leaders like yourself, is where you see the role of College Republicans being at: on campus fostering real debate on the issues of the day, or on the campaign trail getting results for Republican candidates?

JJ: Both.

RSR: What, if elected, do you see as being your biggest priority for TFCR? What would be one thing that you would advocate continuing in Texas, and where would you seek change from the status quo?

JJ: Getting Republicans elected statewide and at the local level too. I would advocate spreading the message of Republicanism across the state and to more young people. Well my mere presence is a change from the Status quo. Don’t you think?

RSR: College Republicans tends to be a rather hierarchical system, where one moves up the chain as experience is gained. You will be one step away from leading TFCR if you win this election. Are we going to see a Chairman Jordan in the future?

JJ: Who knows? Probably. Do you think I would make a great chairman? I may decide to throw my hat in for CRNC chair and go straight to the top from Vice Chair. I know I would have Yogi Bear and Fred Flintstones support; I haven’t heard back from George Jetson yet.

RSR: Your current state chairman, Eliza Vielma, seems to be a very polarizing figure among College Republicans involved at the national level. It appears that most either love her, or hate her. You get to work with Eliza on a more personal level than most, so what is your opinion of the job she has done? Can she really be as hard to get along with as some would say?

JJ: Honestly, from what I hear--depending on who you ask--everybody on the national level is "polarizing". This is one of those loaded questions. Well if I didn’t like Eliza I wouldn’t be answering these questions right now, because I wouldn’t be Vice Chair. So that should tell you something. No she is not hard to get along with and she is doing a great job leading TFCR. By the way she can cook some good Hamburger Helper with the tortillas on the side.

RSR: One of our shared personal heroes is J.C. Watts, of Oklahoma. How hard is it for a Texan to openly like a Sooner, first of all, and secondly, do you see Watts as having a viable future in politics if he chooses to seek it?

JJ: When Watts stops doing those damn infomercials he can come back to politics. But Watts is making too much money in the Private sector to come back to the public sector and who can blame him?

RSR: Why is it that people like Jesse Jackson and Donna Brazile have so voraciously attacked J.C. Watts for his views? Do you see the perception of the Black Republican as a negative one within the African-American community?

JJ: Look at the 2 people you gave me to choose from of course they attack him, he is smarter than both of them put together. The reason Donna attacks him is because she and other black Democrats can't control him like they control black Democrats. Jesse Jackson is an idiot and the fact that most black people will still line up behind the Rev. Baby Daddy should tell you a lot about the state of the black community. When the GOP starts targeting younger upwardly mobile Blacks like myself and others only then will they then see different results.

RSR: Obviously, there is a primary upcoming in early 2008 for President, and people are starting to line up behind candidates. Have you made your decision yet, or is there anyone that you would particularly like to see win the nomination?

JJ: I would love to see Justin Jordan win the nomination! But yes I have gave it some serious thought and I am just undecided right now.

RSR: We wish you the best of luck in next weekend’s election, and anxiously await whatever it is you do next! Thanks for talking with us, and we hope to do it again soon!

The rumors are true: Wilkins set to run in Kentucky

Former Leadership Institute field representative and noted College Republican Morgan Wilkins appears set to announce her campaign for Kentucky Federation of College Republicans Chairman in the coming weeks. A website, www.MorganWilkins.com, has been registered, and a greeting at the site promises a full launch soon. It is not known at this time who else will be entering the race, but speculation centers around a few likely candidates, most notably current KFCR Chairman Brian Weber, of Morehead State. Weber became Chairman following the resignation of Derek Hall last year. Kentucky's CRs will vote on their next slate of state leadership on April 13th, when the annual KFCR Convention is held.

McTiernan Exploratory Committee hits the Net

A website for Erin McTiernan's CRNC Exploratory Committee went live this morning, in a sign that the New York State Chairman is more serious about her candidacy than first assumed by many. The placeholder page can be seen at One CRNC, a domain that was reportedly bought earlier in the week by McTiernan. Two other domains also redirect to the One CRNC site: The New CRNC and United CRNC. We will follow this as it develops, if necessary.

Karriker to run in North Carolina

University of North Carolina Charlotte student, and College Republican Chairman at UNC-Charlotte, Erin Karriker has announced his bid to be the next Chairman of the North Carolina Federation of College Republicans. This appears to have the blessing of current NCFCR head Jon Thompson, as it appears Thompson will not seek another term at the helm. Thompson is the latest in a growing number of state chairmen stepping down at the conclusion of their terms, joining Michigan's Dan Carlson, Florida's Scott Wacholtz, Virginia's Andrew Lamar (term already concluded), Arkansas' John Burris, Colorado's Charlie Smith, and Missouri's Justin Smith (stepped down prior to completion of term), with more surely to follow.

Karriker, meanwhile, released a letter declaring his intentions to seek the post, in a move that coincided with the launch of his campaign website, www.ErinKarriker.org. He currently serves NCFCR as the Communications Director, and is running on a platform of streamlined organization, better communications, and more visible campus activism. The announcement also brought the launch of a coordinating Facebook campaign group, Erin J. Karriker for NCFCR Chairman. Karriker's chapter was awarded NCFCR Chapter of the Year, and he has appeared on FOX News for his efforts on the issue of illegal immigration. Here are some of the highlights of his announcement letter:

"Through vigorous recruiting, equipping new members and reviving the spread of conservative campus activism, we will ensure a successful outcome for the Grand Old Party in 2008.
...It is with sincere respect and humility that I announce my candidacy for State Chairman of the North Carolina Federation of College Republicans. As the chairman of the UNCC College Republicans, I have overseen the most active chapter in the state, enjoying many far-reaching successes. As your next State Chairman, I plan on continuing that level of commitment and dedication to true conservatism."

Next Up: Steve Japinga

Within the past few months, Steve Japinga has burst on the scene in Michigan, announcing his candidacy for Michigan Federation of College Republicans Chairman, putting forth a new plan for MFCR, and weighing in in support of Michigan GOP Chairman Saul Anuzis during his sometimes contentious battle to win re-election. At this point, Japinga is unopposed in his bid to succeed two-term Chairman Dan Carlson, but a fight is looming down ticket between his running mate, Co-Chair candidate Ryan Thompson, and independent Co-Chair candidate Jeff Wiggins, a fellow Michigan State CR of Japinga. As this has become public since this interview was conducted, we did not have the chance to ask Steve about it, but we will definitely be covering it as it develops. So, here it is, our interview with Steve Japinga, next up in Michigan:

Red State Rampage: You are running as a candidate for Chairman of the Michigan Federation of College Republicans. What do you think most qualifies you to be the next Chairman of MFCR, and why are you running for this position?

Steve Japinga: I believe what most qualifies me to be Chairman of MFCRs is my willingness to work with everyone and to have an open and honest dialogue with each College Republican chapter. I’m running for this position because I know I can take the MFCRs to the next level by creating new clubs at Michigan Colleges that do not have College Republican groups, to increase participation, to raise money to give back to the chapters, and to help every Republican candidate.

RSR: Your background in College Republicans has been at Michigan State University. What are you most proud of being a part of while in College Republicans there?

SJ: There are so many different moments that I have been proud of at MSU while participating in the College Republicans. The most honorable moment I can think of was the MSU CRs 9/11 event. We gathered at 8 o’clock the night before September 11 at the Rock, which is a place where fraternities, sororities, and student groups express a messages by painting the “rock”. We painted “9/11, We Will Never Forget” and then put one flag for every soul that died on that terrible day behind it in the ground. We stayed up all night to defend the Rock from groups that wanted to destroy this sacred monument. I will always remember that day.

RSR: Obviously, there is a Presidential race on the horizon, and every candidate is looking for support. A short while ago, a large group of MFCR leaders endorsed John McCain, including the present Chairman of MFCR, Dan Carlson. Do you think that an organization like MFCR should become partial in this primary race? Why exactly do you feel that way?

SJ: I do not believe that the MFCRs should be partial in a primary race. I believe that any Republican that wants to run for President should have a fair shot to show the people of Michigan who they are and what they want to accomplish. In this organization, there is a wide variety of different college republicans that like many different candidates; Tom Tancredo, John McCain, Mitt Romney, Sam Brownback, Rudy Giuliani or Newt Gingrich. College Republicans should be able to work for who they believe in.

RSR: In Michigan after the November elections, there was a push to unseat Michigan GOP Chairman Saul Anuzis. You signed on to a letter, along with many other College Republicans, showing support for Chairman Anuzis. This bid is no longer an active one, but why did you feel the need to support him?

SJ: There was no need to have Saul step down. I felt that Saul has done a great job as our Chair and he has always been helpful with the Michigan State College Republicans and other College Republican clubs. I will continue to support Saul as our Chairman and whatever he does in the future.

RSR: Speaking of the Michigan GOP, how would you work beside them as Chairman of MFCR to achieve victory for the Republican Party at the polls? Is this any different from how the relationship operates now or in the past?

SJ: It’s simple; open communication. I have made great relationships with many of the Michigan Republicans. I want to work with them as much as possible to find out what we need to accomplish so we can win in 2008.

RSR: Currently in your state there is a Democratic Governor and two Democratic US Senators, out of which the Governor and junior Senator were just re-elected. Do you think that College Republicans did enough to defeat them, or could more have been done? Was the onus on the leadership of MFCR or the individual chapters?

SJ: I believe that College Republicans worked their hearts out in this past election. The problem that we faced was that it was always the same people working and there were not enough new people participating. Also, we had no way of knowing that national issues would dominate in a State with the worse[sic] unemployment in the country. We have some of the greatest College Republicans in the country here at our universities and this is apparent with Western Michigan College Republicans winning the best chapter of 2006 in the nation. It is important that if elected Chairman that I work with each chapter so that will be even stronger for 2008.

RSR: If you are elected to a term as Chairman in Michigan, what will be your top priority? What would you most like to leave office having accomplished for your organization?

SJ: If elected as Chairman, my top priority will be to make sure that there is a College Republican club at each university and college in Michigan. When I leave this great organization, I really want to make sure that the College Republicans are ready for the 2008 elections.

RSR: I am sure that your detractors have said Michigan does not need change or that you are not qualified enough to lead MFCR. What would you say to them on these counts, and what makes these accusations false?

SJ: Well, the first thing is I am not a threat. I want to work with everyone, even those who do not support me. I want them to know that I am qualified to lead the MFCRs through my experiences with MSU CRs, my work on various campaigns, and my ability to work with College Republicans.

RSR: As you may well know, there is an election coming up in 2007 for Chairman of the CRNC. Dan Carlson has committed to support Charlie Smith, the Chairman in Colorado. Would you continue this support or would you examine other options before making your decision?

SJ: I support Dan for his national ambitions and believe that having Dan playing an important role in CRNC will be good for Michigan. I have not met Charlie Smith yet and I look forward to talking with him.

RSR: I think that your own state probably comes before the national scene, but do you think that the amendments passed recently in Denver are improvements for the CRNC? Are you happy with the current state of the organization nationally?

SJ: To be perfectly honest, my main focus is with Michigan right now. We need to get this State back to the color Red.

RSR: Within College Republicans, I see two main philosophical camps as far as tactics of operation: those who argue in favor of simply volunteering with candidates and campaigns, and those who are in favor of focusing on campus activism and fostering debate on the campus. Do you see this as an absolute issue, or is there instead a proper mix of the two? How, in your opinion, can CRs be most effective?

SJ: I believe that volunteering for candidates and campaigns, campus activism, and open debate is all important to the effectiveness of College Republicans. Obviously, College Republicans are at their best when they are active.

RSR: One of the biggest struggles that I see within College Republican chapters is not recruitment, but rather retention. Do you feel that retention of members is a difficult task in Michigan as well, and how would you suggest to go about improving the retention rates?

SJ: Yes, I do believe that keeping the members motivated and active is the hardest part in College Republicans. By improving this, I would suggest that College Republican clubs find new and creative ways of retaining members either by having their meetings at different locations other than on campus or holding social events after meetings. There are many different ways to keep clubs fun and exciting for college students.

RSR: Back in the fall, one of the field reps sent by the CRNC to Michigan planned an event called "Catch an Illegal Immigrant", and there was much attention given to the situation that developed from this. The field rep, Morgan Wilkins, was later fired. Do you agree with how the situation was handled? Do you think that CR chapters should push the envelope, so to speak with their own events on campus?

SJ: There was a decision from the national level to have her step down and I respect that decision.

RSR: Dan Carlson has served two terms as Chairman of MFCR, and has undoubtedly made an impact in his tenure with the organization. What is one thing Dan brought to MFCR that you would like to continue in? On the flip side of that, what is one thing that you would do differently?

SJ: One event that I will continue if elected as Chair is the “Resolution Weekends.” This was an idea that became a reality for College Republicans from all over the state to come to a certain college campus and help out candidates in that specific area. It is a great chance to meet new people from other College Republican clubs. On the flip side, I would have done more events to bring College Republicans together.

RSR: Thank you very much for your openness and honesty in answering my questions, and best of luck in the rest of your campaign for MFCR Chairman. One final question for you though: will Mark Dantonio be successful with Spartan football, even at a school where basketball reigns supreme?

SJ: Mark Dantonio will be very successful at Michigan State. We are very happy to have him!

BREAKING: Florida's Wacholtz not seeking re-election; 2 candidates emerge to succeed him

As the spring months approach, many states will be holding elections in their respective College Republican federations, and each individual race will be of great import to the upcoming CRNC elections in June. It appeared just a few weeks ago that Florida's Chairman Scott Wacholtz would be seeking a second term, but it now is known that Wacholtz will instead step away from FFCR at the end of his term. Vying to succeed him are two members of his Executive Board, First Vice Chair David Stevens and Treasurer Tommy Keller. Stevens, hailing from Florida State University, was a past chapter Chairman at FSU, and served as Wacholtz' running mate in 2006. Keller, who is a student at Stetson, was elected as Treasurer of FFCR in November of 2005, and he has named Florida Atlantic University CR Stacey Chait as his running mate.

Both campaigns have set up Facebook groups, the campaign site of choice for College Republican elections everywhere, and have released letters announcing their intents to run for the open positions. Tommy Keller's group, Tommy Keller for Chairman, boasts 78 current members, and features a letter detailing some of the plans Keller has for FFCR leading up to the 2008 Presidential elections.

"It is too simplistic for any individual seeking Chairmanship of this organization to boast about supposed accomplishments that have recently been made. However, if we are to have the most influential impact, it is time to be honest. The question, “What is the purpose of our State Federation?” must weigh heavily upon the minds of the elect in this organization. And the current status quo cannot and must not continue into another term."

The group touting the candidacy of David Stevens, David Stevens for FFCR Chairman, also features a letter declaring his candidacy, but, in addition to that, features a list of Stevens' accomplishments as well as a couple of choice photos, while having slightly fewer members at 60.

"...we have worked hard to expand our federation and lay the foundation so that the FFCR will be the best in the country. While I was disappointed to hear that Scott would not seek a second term, I fully understand his reasoning and wish him well in his future endeavors. Scott has done a great job this past year, but there is much still left to do. After discussing the matter with friends and family, I have decided to announce my candidacy for Chairman of the Florida Federation of College Republicans. In order to take our federation to the next level, we need someone who is dedicated, organized, and experienced."

BREAKING: Stewie Griffin to run for CRNC Chair?

A source in Ohio just alerted me to a new Facebook group started in light of the circus that is the CRNC election pushing Stewie Griffin for CRNC Chairman. The group states that Stewie Griffin is the only man who can get the job done, and has already equaled the momentum driving the express train that is the Erin McTiernan for CRNC Chairman push at four members. The group is surely to catch on like wildfire and will probably force many a would-be candidate out of the race. Red State Rampage could not reach Mr. Griffin, most famous for his ongoing tenure on the FOX sitcom Family Guy as himself, or any member of his staff for comment at this hour. We will continue to develop this evolving and emerging story as it takes the College Republican world by storm. If Stewie Griffin is indeed formally declaring his candidacy, the dynamic of this race will change drastically, as it is almost sure none of the existing candidates are of equal, or even comparable, stock.

CRNC Election News & Notes

-We will be soon posting interviews with candidate for Michigan Fed. of College Republicans Chairman Steve Japinga, a Michigan State CR, and interim Texas Fed. of College Republicans Vice Chairman Justin Jordan in the coming days. The interview with Japinga should be up later this morning, and we are also in the process of interviewing Students for Brownback Chairman Billy Valentine. Stay tuned for these, and several more interviews in the pipeline over the coming weeks.

-In a move that has been expected for some time, Rhode Island's Ethan Wingfield endorsed Real Reform yesterday, releasing the following statement on his support:

“The biggest challenge the College Republicans face is not reforming its national committee. Our challenge is building an organizational infrastructure that will make it easier for Republicans to get elected. The common-sense goals of the Real Reform platform will streamline the organization, make it less succeptible (sic) to corruption, and will ultimately enable us to more effectively campaign on behalf of candidates we all want to see elected. That's why Rhode Island voted unanimously to support Real Reform.”

The endorsement makes formal what has been known for sometime, and there seems to be quite a bit of grassroots support for reform at the chapter level in Rhode Island. There are now 17 sitting state chairmen supporting Real Reform, and we keep hearing whispers of a major announcement coming from Real Reform principals Brian Siler and Brent Ludeman.

-Truth Caucus is reporting that New York's Erin McTiernan is exploring the possibility of the run for National Chairman. McTiernan is best known nationally for calling out Paul Gourley publicly over a few matters, most notably for the alleged subterfuge of a CRNC field rep in recruiting a registered Democrat to run a College Republican chapter in New York. New York has a long history of infighting, but it is a state who has been solidly in support of reform for some time. It, along with California, is a state notably absent from the supporters of Real Reform.

Students for Brownback Chairman issues statement on John McCain

With all of the buzz surrounding recent College Republican figures endorsing John McCain for President, and the donations given to some of the figures who endorsed Sen. McCain, Students for Brownback Chairman Billy Valentine has issued a brief statement in response:

"It is no surprise that College Republicans continue to sell out the conservative movement to moderate Senator John McCain considering the large sums of cash he has been offering for their souls. Unlike Senator McCain, Senator Brownback has been winning College Republican support through his consistent conservative record, something that money simply can't buy."

We at Red State Rampage have been very vocal in our criticisms of the McCain campaign for seemingly buying College Republican support, so it is refreshing to see another voice, especially one from another candidate's team, picking up on this. Back in the fall, Sen. Sam Brownback spoke to over 400 students and College Republicans in Ohio, and Brownback will also be a featured speaker at CPAC this coming March.

Three's Company Once Again: Derek Hall Dodges the Draft Movement

The field of potential candidates is back down to three tonight after Kentucky's Derek Hall opted not to seek a term as Chairman of the CRNC in 2007. Over the past few weeks talk had surfaced about Hall's national intentions at a fervor not seen since the summer of 2006, when a candidacy for Chairman by Hall was seen as very likely. With this announcement, the field is pared back down to include the team of Brian Siler and Brent Ludeman, Charlie Smith, and an ever looming bid by Dan Schuberth, who seemed very much a candidate at the December 2006 CRNC Board Meeting. Draft Derek Hall, the blog that really brought talk of a Hall candidacy back to the forefront of College Republicans, has the statement, as does Truth Caucus. Due to the eloquence of Hall's letter, it is being posted here also:

"The past two weeks have been quite a whirlwind experience for me. I have talked to many individuals about the possibility of running for the position of CRNC Chairman, but I felt it was necessary to officially announce that as of now I have decided not to run for the position. I have been extremely flattered by the outpour of support and kind words; I was not expecting to hear from so many individuals from across the country.

I have worked diligently for the College Republicans since stepping foot on the campus of the University of Kentucky, and I feel that I have an invested interest in the future of this organization. We all need to recognize its time to introduce sound, intelligent reform to the CRNC, and hopefully our candidates will continue to preach this message as they campaign over the coming months. At times, we over-complicate this organization, and I hope that our next crop of leaders realize its time to simplify each facet of the group. This means we need to put more emphasis on helping to win real elections and strengthening our local chapters. We need to stand together and proclaim that playing politics within the CRNC is the business of the past and promoting the Republican Party is the answer for the future.

Once again, I want to thank everyone for their support, and I hope we are able to come together to produce the best team for guiding the CRNC. Thank you and God bless."

Hall is still expected to find a place on someone's ticket, and a close relationship with Missouri's Justin Smith and Ohio's Brian Siler could play a large role in where Hall stands in the upcoming race. In the recent Truth Caucus poll, candidates from states supporting Real Reform, including Derek Hall, Brian Siler, and Brent Ludeman, won 78% of the vote, so a combination of the three on a ticket could prove formidable. It is also very refreshing to see someone talking of winning real elections and promoting the Republican Party over inter-organizational squabbles; for whatever reason this seems to have been absent for some time within the CRNC. We will continue to follow all of the potential candidates in the race, and have continuous updates on any decisions being made. No formal announcements are set as of yet, but it is rumored that all candidates are within days of making their final decisions.

Editorial: The Many Faces of Charlie Smith

Just who is Charlie Smith? Why is he running to be the next Chairman of the CRNC? What exactly does Charlie Smith stand for? For the casual follower of College Republican politics, those who simply read the headlines and look no further into them, these are questions that cannot be answered. To the average onlooker, they may even think there are three separate Charlie Smiths in our organization: the Charlie Smith who voted for Paul Gourley and was vying to be the heir to his throne, the Charlie Smith who was vowing to Unite the CRNC just weeks ago, and the Charlie Smith that now wants to bring you, Joe CR, a New CRNC by embracing reform and an agenda he once opposed. That average CR would be right, too, in thinking that three separate versions of Charlie Smith exist, because within the past six months each face of Smith has been worn publicly.

There really is no true way to tell where Charlie Smith does, in fact stand, and this is not a good place for a politician of any level to be. Fresh in American minds is the image of a flip-flopping John Kerry, a man who measured the changing winds of opinion before making his choice. In the 2005 CRNC election, Charlie Smith publicly endorsed the current Chairman of the CRNC, H. Paul Gourley, and Colorado cast its electoral votes in favor of Chairman Gourley. This past summer, and into the early fall, Smith was maneuvering to succeed the wounded Chairman in 2007 and be anointed heir to the relative dynasty that is the Establishment within the CRNC. He held at least two separate conference calls discussing the possibility of him running in place of Gourley, in order that the Opposition may not become victorious in the next go round. There was no doubt, until very recently, whose side Charlie Smith stood on.

Then came a couple of amendments, one proposed in 2005 and pulled from the floor and the other a new idea. Both involved making the elections process more accountable, and both were seen by some as a vengeful act by holdovers from the 2005 campaign. Charlie Smith signed on as a sponsor, and Charlie the Uniter was born. In the run-up to the 2006 CRNC Winter Board Meeting, held just last month in Denver, both sides bickered back and forth regarding the merits and intent of the amendments, but by December when state chairmen gathered to vote in the Rockies, both would pass with ease. Some still in the CRNC office were not happy with them, nor with Charlie for playing a role in their passage. Smith's former patrons were none too pleased with their protege, and this is why Charlie Smith did not announce his candidacy at the Board Meeting.

Now playing cowboy, and rounding up all of his straying cattle, he was on the defensive. No solid platform had been proposed, and so Ohio's Brian Siler and Brent Ludeman of Washington, two other rumored candidates, put forth an all-encompassing slate of ideas for reform, under the label of Real Reform. Nearly every supporter of Real Reform initially, and to this day, has been an unquestioned supporter of reforming the CRNC, so it was somewhat surprising to see Charlie's response to the move. Charlie Smith was so brash to welcome proponents of Real Reform to the debate, a debate that Charlie himself was more than fashionably late to. He released his own list of supporters, and it was noticeably heavy on Gourley supporters, especially for a group posing as one of reformers. What he could not admit, however, was that his letter brought no substance to the debate, but merely rhetoric.

Still portending to wish a coming together, a unification of the CRNC, Charlie Smith purchased a domain to back up his Unite the CRNC platform, which never went live (and no platform ever emerged). Shortly after this was discovered, just in the past few days, Smith shifted his focus yet again. After receiving a mere 22% of the vote in a Truth Caucus poll, he wrapped himself in a new banner: a New CRNC. Another domain was bought, and College Republicans were left wondering what this Smith guy stood for.

As a Christian, a conservative, and a Republican, I am all for conversions in faith and beliefs. One of the biggest goals of College Republican organizations across the nation should be winning hearts and minds with our proven message. True conversion is something that must manifest itself in concrete actions and not mere words. So when I see politicians converting from pro-life to pro-choice, and back again, simply for the purpose of winning votes and support, it disgusts me. I have seen this same convenient conversion, still a false change, in the evolving stances of Charlie Smith.

This pandering nature is something I have noticed for some time, and have remained quiet. Everyone should be given a chance to show themselves true, and so I have allowed this chance multiple times in Charlie Smith's case. Time and time again, we have seen him change his foundations to what is currently popular, seemingly for his own benefit. Though I have not met him, Michael Davidson appears to me to be a great diviner of character. You will recall that Davidson recently met for dinner with Charlie Smith, purportedly to discuss Smith's intentions of running nationally. You will also recall that Smith was sent away for want of solid evidence of his reformer stance. If Michael Davidson did not see him as a true reformer, I remain hesitant to as well. This upcoming CRNC election is far too important to choose a new Chairman based solely upon what a man may say. No, we must follow those who have backed up their words with actions, like at least three other possible candidates have. We cannot, and must not pick a man who does not even know where he himself stands. Charlie Smith, a man of many faces, is most definitely not the man for the job.

From here on out, Red State Rampage will pull no punches, because Charlie's third change was the charm. We need leadership with clear direction, not someone who is heading down three separate paths. We need a man who will stand up and fight for his beliefs, not a man wishing to be everything to everyone. The answer to the question, then, is that no one really can know who Charlie Smith is. One thing is certain though: until he makes up his mind, we should not be trusting him to lead us.